Category Archives: Articles

Lustbader’s Elder

“One morning I was sitting at my kitchen table, staring into space. It was one of those windy days when the sun keeps coming out and going in. All of a sudden, a sunbeam crossed my kitchen table and lit up my crystal saltshaker. There were all kinds of colors and sparkles. It was one of the most beautiful sights I’d ever seen.

“But, you know, that very same saltshaker had been on that kitchen table for over fifty years. Surely there must have been other mornings when the sun crossed the table like that, but I was just too busy getting things done. I wondered what else I’d missed. I realized this was it, this was grace.”

These words were spoken by an 86-year old woman named Martha McCallum to Wendy Lustbader, a Seattle-based geriatric social worker and writer. Ms. Lustbader includes this quotation among many others in her new book “What’s Worth Knowing.” This small volume comes filled with meaningful encounters between the author and the older people she meets along her path.

At a recent national conference on aging, I heard Wendy Lustbader talk about her work with elders and her discoveries about their spirituality. The author’s skill in presentation dazzled me and others at the conference. There were times during one talk when tears came to the eyes of many who listened to Ms. Lustbader’s accounts of her discoveries about her clients and other people.

The revelation described by the woman quoted above happens in the midst of routine domestic life. As she herself notes, the same physical scene must have confronted her many times previously, but this occasion was different. Somehow she became aware of a reality that had escaped her notice previously. That reality was the beauty of the light.

What might have made the difference this time was not a change in the scenery but rather something inside the woman. The author describes the effect that a chronic illness had on her: “Once arthritis slowed her down, Martha McCallum would spend a lot of time sitting at her kitchen table. She had such a fully alive presence that to those who joined her at the table she herself seemed to gleam as much as her crystal saltshaker.”

Being forced to slow down, doing more sitting than she had done before, disposed the woman to be more receptive than she had been when busier. Her soul had become more sensitive to a scene that had not previously revealed its full beauty. For the moment she became like the 17th century Dutchman Jan Vermeer whose much-prized paintings display light that transforms scenes of daily life.

Or going back further, the woman had become like Mary in the Gospel of Luke. Her sister Martha was doing the household work to provide hospitality to Jesus when he came to visit. Jesus surprises his listeners by praising Mary for “having chosen the better part.” The contemplative role of listening is the one that opens the soul to the revelation of beauty all around.

Pay attention to what Martha McCallum calls the special moment when she noticed the colors in her saltshaker – – she calls it  “grace.” This makes it a divine gift freely given to open human awareness to the beauty that lies all around. It disposes the soul to become conscious that this world contains more power than we knew.

Ms. McCallum’s statement “I wondered what else I’d missed” also suggests on her part a new awareness that, as the poet Gerard Manley Hopkins says, “The world is charged with the grandeur of God.”

This grandeur is missed most of the time even by people who are convinced of its presence. “Human kind cannot bear very much reality,” says T. S. Eliot in his play “Murder in the Cathedral.” But, as this incident shows, at rare moments we can be struck by sudden spiritual awareness that makes life precious.

In this instance the person receiving the sudden illumination was 86 years old. To those who may think that later life does not hold much value, this event is a forceful refutation of such a view. It is never too late for moments of revelation that suddenly provide insight into the beauty of things. No one can predict when those moments might come.    

Richard Griffin

Huston Smith and Faith

Huston Smith, looking back over his 81 years on earth, feels grateful to his parents for the inheritance that they passed on to him. This inheritance was not money, but faith.

They were Methodist missionaries in China; there they brought up their son who would become one of this country’s foremost scholars of world religions. Through his appearances on public television, especially in a five-part program produced by Bill Moyers in 1996, Huston Smith has become well known to the many Americans to whom religion speaks meaningfully.

Now retired, Huston Smith continues to write about faith, religion, spirituality, and their importance for people of our time. Last week in New Orleans, I had the opportunity to talk with this man of insight and feeling. Looking into his deeply sympathetic face, I felt myself in the presence of someone who appreciates the splendor of human life and the mystery that surrounds it.

He summarizes the personal faith received from his parents in two simple sentences. We are in good hands. In gratitude for what we have received, we should bear one another’s burdens.

Of the inheritance from his parents he writes: “On coming to America for college, I brought that faith with me, and the rest of my life has been a struggle to keep it intact in the face of the modern winds of doctrine that assail it.”

This quotation comes from his most recent book “Why Religion Matters.” There he presents religion as a necessary way of understanding human identity and the meaning of the world.

Professor Smith knows about the modern winds of doctrine at first hand. During his long career he has taught at Washington University in St. Louis, M.I.T., Syracuse, and the  University of California at Berkeley. In academia, he had constant contact with ideologies quite closed to spiritual reality and dead to the legacy left by the great religious traditions of the world.

Professor Smith does not fail to admire science and the technology that has transformed the way modern people live. But he insists that science cannot answer the great “why” questions such as those asked by the French painter Paul Gaugin in one of his most celebrated pieces of art: “Who are we? Where did we come from? Where are we going?”

Science, for all its wondrous achievements, cannot speak to “the basic longing that lies in the depths of the human heart.” That longing finds a response in the great religious traditions of the world, traditions that Professor Smith has devoted his life to studying.

Though most people do not see it, he believes that the modern world remains in deep crisis. “Giving a blank check to science” is the prime cause of this crisis, he says. Instead of recognizing that scientists cannot answer the “why” questions, our contemporaries expect them to know everything or, at least, be on the way to universal knowledge.

Going against the views of many Americans, especially young people, Huston Smith does not feel that spirituality by itself is the answer. “I am waging a one-man war against spirituality nosing out religion and turning it into a pejorative,” he told me with passion in his voice.

He knows and understands the criticisms people make about religion, its dogmatism and moralistic approach to life, telling you what not to do. But, he says, “I argue with them.”

“Religion is organized spirituality,” he explains. “As such, it takes on the burden of all the shadow side of the institution.”  

But, if there were no religious institutions you would not have the great treasures of spirituality, he argues. The Sermon on the Mount of Jesus and the Four Noble Truths of the Buddha would both have been quickly lost unless they were carried down over thousands of years by institutions.

What is likely to happen to the major organized religions in the twenty-first century, I asked. Professor Smith sees them as coming closer to one another in our global society. However, for those in the West, at least, they will have to come to grips with the question of their relationship to science.

These religious traditions must convince people that science does not have all the answers. The way science views the world is incomplete and requires religion to reveal a deeper reality.

Richard Griffin

SLOTH

“Why do I dread vacuuming?” asks Kathleen Norris, the author of several books on spirituality widely acclaimed for their winning style and sharp insight. By such works as “Dakota,” “The Cloistered Walk,” and “Amazing Grace” she has gained for herself an enthusiastic group of readers.

“What makes us resist repetition? Is it simple laziness or something else?” – – two other questions she asks herself and members of a large audience.

She then reaches back to childhood memories and recalls wondering about the need to make her bed in the morning when the same thing would have to be done all over again the next day. “I wanted to do things once and for all and be done with it,” she explains.

She likes to quote the Danish philosopher Kierkegaard who wrote about repetition and asserted that it is reality. And yet, the temptation to reject the repetition of daily tasks and recurring duties often assails, not merely Kathleen Norris, but many other people as well.

As she points out, the problem becomes more serious when it extends to the people who loom large in our lives. “How does a beloved familiar face become an object of scorn?” she wonders.

How indeed? This kind of change surely ranks as among the most painful and undesirable transitions that ever take place in human life.

And yet it happens all too frequently: people who were in love fall into bitter animosity toward one another and feel it necessary to split. That is when they do not take a gun and shoot their former beloved.

Surprisingly, Ms. Norris connects this phenomenon with the classical vice of sloth or “acedia” as it used to be called. The latter word comes from the Greek language and means “without care.” This vice inclines us to become discontented with our current situation, no matter what it might be.

Ms. Norris calls sloth or acedia “a vicious enemy of the soul.” From early on it was seen as such in monastic history: the monks of the desert connected this vice with the work of the devil. In fact they referred to it as the “noonday devil,” spoken of in Psalm 90.

C. S. Lewis, author of the spiritual classic “The Screwtape Letters,” first published in 1942, imagines an exchange of letters between Screwtape, the chief devil, and Wormwood, his young nephew, a devil in training. Analyzing the desire for novelty, he writes ironically:

“The horror of the Same Old Thing is one of the most valuable passions we have produced in the human heart –  – an endless source of heresies in religion, folly in counsel, infidelity in marriage, and inconstancy in friendship.”

Screwtape goes on to explain that the demand for infinite change is invaluable for the devils’ purposes. “The pleasure of novelty is by its very nature more subject than any other to the law of diminishing returns,” he writes. Thus one is never satisfied with the latest new thing for long.

Sloth is the product of a deadened spirit. It also involves sadness, a spiritual condition that appears as melancholy, weariness with life, and dissatisfaction. Spiritual torpor and apathy can be evidence of this inner malady.

The opposite approach to life emerges from words written by Dorothy Day and quoted in space last week. This woman, whose name has been submitted to the Vatican for possible designation as a saint, said this about the work that she did for homeless people in New York City:

“Paperwork, cleaning the house, cooking the meals, dealing with innumerable visitors who come all through the day, answering the phone, keeping patience and acting intelligently, which is to find some meaning in all those encounters –  – these things, too, are the works of peace, and often seem like a very little way.”

With the last three words, Dorothy Day points to a style of life that is marked by care. In calling such care “little” she was probably conscious of an irony. What appears small, can have large consequences in the daily life of a person involved in the search for God.

Care for other people and care for things that are important in our life count for much toward growth of the spirit. In showing concern for details that go into caring, a person can resist the deadly temptations of sloth and gather spiritual energies for doing the work of God.

Richard Griffin

Music and Poetry

As the Angel sang, tears filled my eyes and flowed down my cheeks. The voice of mezzo-soprano Michelle DeYoung voice rose so beautifully as she gave expression to Cardinal Newman’s words and Edward Elgar’s music that I could not help but weep.

With Ben Zander conducting the Boston Philharmonic Orchestra in Symphony Hall and the Chorus Pro Musica assisting, the “Dream of Gerontius” stirred my depths last week, as it always does. This musical drama of a soul’s journey through death to heaven never fails to move me with the wonder of it all.

I had last heard this favorite piece performed in 1992 in St. Paul’s Cathedral in London, another splendid site for this oratorio. On that occasion too, I remember how beautifully Catherine Wyn-Rogers  sang the angel. And in1982 I had heard the Boston Symphony Orchestra do it with Jessye Norman singing the same role.

Such esthetic events often lead me to reflect on early educational experiences, on what counts in the long run, and what does not. Two kinds of experiences in particular stand out.

The first took place when I was in the early grades in the Belmont public schools. There, amazingly enough, each week we used to hear each performances of the NBC Symphony Orchestra over the radio. The broadcasts came into our classrooms through the public address system and we listened while sitting at our desks.

At a distance of more than sixty years, it seems almost incredible to me now that this ever happened. And yet, it turned out to be one of the most formative influences in my life. Listening to classical music gave me a cultural resource of such importance that it has fed my soul all through the intervening decades. I will always remember with appreciation Walter Damrosch, the orchestra’s then conductor, and the far-sighted leaders of our public schools who made the performances part of our curriculum.

Of course, many other influences combined to foster my love for music as I grew up. An adopted aunt, in particular, helped by giving me a record player so that I could play operatic performances and other music for myself. She is the one who took me backstage after a Metropolitan Opera performance of La Traviata to meet the star Eleanor Steber who had been her longtime friend.

I remember with awe the diva in her dressing room, splendidly costumed and her breast still heaving after the exertions of the leading role. The experience stamped on my psyche the glamour of the opera stage and the excitement of big-time performances.

The other educational experience that has stayed with me is memorizing poetry. This practice, too, has been largely abandoned despite the almost universal testimony of those of us over a certain age who still relish its benefits.

Surprisingly, my Shakespeare professor in sophomore year at Harvard College, F. O. Matthiessen, gave us long sections of Troilus and Cressida and King Lear to memorize. I still love the passage from the second of these plays “O reason not the need / Our basest beggars are in the poorest things superfluous” and think of these lines when I see people panhandling in Harvard Square. Or the one from the infrequently performed Troilus that begins “Time hath, my lord, a wallet at his back / Wherein he puts alms for Oblivion.”

I treasure this legacy from a man who, it later turned out, was deeply troubled himself. In 1950 he plunged from a window in Boston’s Hotel Manger to his death many floors below.

In the long run, the fine arts prove more valuable for some of us than the pragmatic things we had to study in school. Certainly they were of greater worth than many of the dry rationalistic philosophy and theology courses I took later.

Those radio broadcasts that we elementary school students heard each week were powerful influences with lasting power. Do any public schools provide this kind of listening education for students now? Most of the young people whom I know are utterly unfamiliar with the great tradition.

And how many carry in their memories lines of great poetry such as those from Shakespeare’s plays? Not many at all, I would wager. It would surprise me to discover that any current Harvard professors were assigning memorization.

And yet last week I attended a memorial service for an eminent philosopher who died on Christmas Day of last year. One of the speakers recalled that the philosopher was fond of quoting the whole of Edgar Allen Poe’s poem “The Raven,” as well as other favorite pieces. He also could recite with pleasure large swatches of Gilbert and Sullivan.

Readers will recall cultural influences from their own lives that have proven to have remarkable staying power. These are the experiences that continue to humanize us and make our later life richer in memory and current affect.

Richard Griffin

Mardi Gras Celebration

Some things should not be done late in life. Having a wisdom tooth extracted, for example.

That is what I underwent on Tuesday of last week. Let me assure you – – there have to be many better ways of celebrating Mardi Gras.

Getting out an old tooth, impacted, close to the bone and cozying up to a nerve, amounts to a first-class ordeal, I discovered. Even my surgeon, highly skilled and experienced, had a hard time with my mouth. I could see it in his eyes, only a foot away from mine. Undoubtedly, he could see the terror in mine.

Heavily Novocained or not, you don’t feel comfortable when your gum is cut away and your subterranean tooth is grabbed by steel extraction instruments. Then, when this approach does not work and the dentist has to break up the tooth by drilling it apart, that, too, does not provide highly pleasing sensations.

We human beings are said to have some 65,000 ideas float through our minds in the course of a single day. During this surgery, all but two of mine remained on hold

The first was, “When will this operation ever end?” And the second, “Which of all the horrible injuries mentioned in the pre-operative consent form are going to happen to me?” At this point, I might have gladly settled for a broken jaw.

Please understand, my dental surgeon is one of the nicest guys in the whole world and I would recommend his services to anyone. I also care about him as a friend. So I attribute the travail detailed here to the nature of my mouth and none at all to my dentist.

He ranks as the most considerate and solicitous professional you could meet. But no one has ever accused me of being normal. He himself told me, “Your bone was like concrete.”

That tooth had been encased there for more than fifty years. And, until this past autumn, it found my mouth a comfortable lodging place. Then it suddenly announced its presence by ballooning up the left side of my face.

The signs immediately before the operation were not favorable. I ran into Eric, one of the many workers who are doing macrocosmic surgery on our neighborhood by implanting an 80-foot water tank 35 feet under the street next to ours. When I told him of my destination, he looked at me and said tactfully, “You should have had it out 30 years ago.” Some kind of encouragement!

And a husband and wife, the two of them considerably older than I, were preparing to leave when I arrived in the waiting room. The husband, with the kind of detachment that allows humor, told his wife who had just had two teeth removed and was looking peaked, “You must feel lighter.”

Then I heard from a reader in Georgetown who informed me: “Mr. Griffin, you have grown older but you have not yet grown up.”  He intended it as a condemnation of my views about Dubya but I take it as a pejorative explanation of why, at my advanced age, a wisdom tooth had to be removed.

My saga represents only the latest in a long and adventurous dental history. In keeping with a firmly held resolution never to regale readers with the family’s medications nor details of my own intestinal life, I will spare you a blow- by-blow account of my mouth.

It all started badly when I got hit with a baseball when playing in the street and broke off the centermost upper front tooth. That began an inexorable series of dental reverses that has brought me to this advanced age, wounded. Root canals, extractions, crowns, whatever –  – I have drawn on a wide selection of the dental repertoire.

In recent years I have often asked dentists, “Which is going to last longer, my teeth or me?” No one yet has hazarded an answer to that question, so vital to my prospects.

Two reflections about this whole experience continue to intrigue me. First, the name “wisdom” tooth. Reportedly, it derives from the idea that the late teenage years and the early twenties mark the onset of wisdom. If you can believe that, you have truly been out of touch lately with the younger generation.

Secondly, wisdom teeth are problematic because the normal four of them try to squeeze in to a space where only 28 can fit. Thus, they are a sign of evolution, the way human beings have changed through the millennia, losing some of the needs for fiercely chewing into uncooked meat. How intriguing to think of oneself as descended from creatures who exhibited almost as much ferocity as we do.

By the way, as of this writing, I am recovering nicely from the ravages of extraction. Friends and associates, better be warned: soon I will be able to open my mouth again, all the way.

Richard Griffin

The Little Red Book

“Paperwork, cleaning the house, cooking the meals, dealing with innumerable visitors who come all through the day, answering the phone, keeping patience and acting intelligently, which is to find some meaning in all these encounters – – these things, too, are the works of peace, and often seem like a very little way.”

These words were written by Dorothy Day, founder of the Catholic Worker movement. In them she describes work at what she called a “house of hospitality” for the homeless poor in New York City. She also identifies these daily tasks as a unpretentious way of seeking God. The Catholic Church now calls this great-souled woman a “Servant of God,” the first step on the way toward official recognition as a saint.

This quotation comes from a little red book now given to incoming freshman at Boston College. Its formal title is “What Are We? An Introduction to Boston College and its Jesuit Traditions.” So popular has this pocket-sized volume become that the university has answered requests for it from many alums and interested others.

According to Father Joseph Appleyard, the Jesuit who serves as vice president for university mission and ministry, he and the others at Boston College’s Center for Ignatian Spirituality who conceived the book’s design simply said to themselves, “We want this to be unlike any other book that students will have.” That is how it turned out to have a plain red binding without any words or illustrations on the cover.

Thus the nickname “little red book” was not intended to remind people of the famous book of Chairman Mao referred to by that name. Almost inevitably, however, some readers will make that connection. Published in the 1960s, this collection of sayings by the Chinese Communist leader who revolutionized his country became faddish reading matter for many young people in revolt against the institutions of mainstream American society.

In fewer than 200 small pages, the Boston College “little red book” provides a wide range of passages from the great spiritual leaders of the world. In the first section, the readings come largely from the Jesuit founder St. Ignatius Loyola and other members of the order.

Other selections range from the Buddha to the 13th century Persian poet Rumi, from the Diamond Sutra to the Qu’ran, from the Dalai Lama to Anne Sexton.  Martin Luther King appears here along with Gandhi, St. Francis of Assisi, and the anonymous authors of  “Swing Low, Sweet Chariot.”

These writings and sayings from the spiritual masters are printed on the left-hand pages of the book. The right-hand pages contain, among other valuable information, a running account of the history of Boston College, the educational and spiritual ideals that animated the Jesuits who founded it in 1863 and built it into a university, and guidance on issues that face students in the contemporary world.

Though the book is intended primarily for young people, in fact, Father Appleyard tells me, “all the positive response to the book has come from people over thirty.” That does not mean a lack of response from the undergrads but simply that they have not yet been heard from. The Center is about to begin an evaluation by email designed to discover what students think of the book.

Speaking of email, Father Appleyard expects the little red book to be available on line in the near future. Readers will soon be able to find it at http://www.bc.edu with a link to the Center for Ignatian Spirituality.

Pondering a great variety of what is contained in the little red book, readers may feel better fortified for the struggles of the spiritual life and consoled by the examples of those who have entered into harmony with God.

One of the many passages that speak to me comes from Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, a favorite guru of mine. “Prayer comes to pass,” he wrote, “ in a complete turning of the heart toward God, toward His goodness and power. It is the momentary disregard of one’s personal concerns, the absence of self-centered thoughts, which constitute the art of prayer. Feeling becomes prayer in the moment when one forgets oneself and becomes aware of God.”

With words like these I feel inspired toward the kind of disinterested turning to God that has long been an ideal for me but too seldom realized.

Richard Griffin

Constantine’s Sword

“I have been encountering strangers all over the country who have taken up the issues of the book.” So says James Carroll, author of “Constantine’s Sword: the Church and the Jews: a History.” This work has recently climbed to number ten on the leading list of best sellers, an indication that Carroll is not overstating the level of interest it has stirred.

Though the author is a longtime friend and I cannot be expected to take a neutral stance toward his work, I rate “Constantine’s Sword” among the most stimulating books I have ever read. Almost every page features findings and insights that forced me to think more deeply. And, at the same time, the author’s polished style makes the book a pleasure to read despite the demands that the often complex material makes on readers.

Carroll himself makes the story he tells very personal as he weaves into his narrative events from his own earlier life and that of the family in which he grew up. In this way he shows how he himself, like other Catholics of his time and place, took in misconceptions about Christian history and developed attitudes prejudicial toward Jewish people.

Rather than trying to summarize a book of unusually wide scope and one full of details culled from a 2000-year history, I will instead focus on what the work means to the author and also to me, two friends who share something of the same experience.

For James Carroll the book represents a new venture and an ambitious one indeed. In embarking on a work of history, he was moving into a literary genre different from the ones in which he has made his considerable reputation as a writer. Earlier he had written nine novels plus a memoir  “An American Requiem” that won a National Book Award in 1996.

“Constantine’s Sword” required a great deal of research, as hundreds of footnotes attest. With the help of two research assistants, Carroll read and consulted an astoundingly wide range of books and periodicals. For a person without long experience in this kind of scholarship, this study represents a considerable achievement.

Undoubtedly, Carroll knew that he would face criticism from professional historians. These academics could be counted on for negative appraisals about at least some of his work; some would probably resent a writer outside the field doing history at all.

In fact, criticism from that source has already appeared: “Commonweal” carried a long review written by a University of Virginia historian who blasted the book and called it “an effort not to understand but to use history to advance a tendentious agenda.”

Carroll also knew that some leaders in his own church would probably brand the book as contrary to official teaching, if not downright heretical. At the least, they would not be ready to accept widespread criticism of the popes and other office holders. The author also knew that he would not be writing a perfect book, one free from mistakes or erroneous interpretations of theology, history, and scripture.

Nonetheless Carroll moved bravely ahead in crafting this work of conscience and he remained convinced that writing it would help advance the cause of justice, understanding, and peace. Some would call him “anti-Catholic” but he had confidence that ultimately he was doing the church an important service.

What must have been most difficult of all was the subtle threat to his own religious stance. My friend acknowledges that writing this book did indeed lead him into a personal crisis of faith. Detailing the awful record of his church’s treatment of the Jews deeply troubled his confidence in the religious tradition in which he grew up and, in his first career, functioned as a priest. As he writes in the Epilogue, “My faith is forever shaken, and I will always tremble.”

In a lesser  way, I too have felt shaken by the history that my friend Jim recounts so dramatically. Reading about hatred of Jews as perpetrated by both officials in the Church and ordinary members I found deeply disturbing. Often I felt ashamed of what was done in the name of religion to humiliate people on the basis of their religious or ethnic heritage.

Granted that I personally was not involved in events that happened centuries before my birth, still I am part of an institution responsible for a large share of it. Like the book’s author, I too served as a priest: both of us worked in campus ministry during the same era. We were thus official representatives of a community of faith that has a record shockingly flawed.

And, yet, I recognize that this community is made up of human beings. Like my friend Jim, I see us as loved by God who recognizes what it means to be human rather than divine, imperfect not absolute. Ultimately, I feel myself part of a community capable of both heroic acts of virtue and also of troubling ignorance and horrendous betrayal of ideals.

Richard Griffin