The Mairs

Nancy Mairs stayed at our local university all last week as “Lenten Writer in Residence.”  Together with her husband George, she offered prayerful reflections that come from a life intensely lived.

The intensity of her life finds expression in a series of books, the most recent of which she entitles “A Troubled Guest: Life and Death Stories.”  Of this work and its author, one reviewer says: “She never minces words or backs away from strong opinions, neither does she aim to shock.”

Yet, whether she aims to or not, Nancy Mairs does sometimes shock when she talks about her personal life. For example, in telling about the difficulties she has encountered she lists the following three: the multiple sclerosis that has largely confined her to a wheelchair, the murder of an adopted son, and the life-threatening melanoma suffered by her husband.

To these three, she then adds a fourth: the adulterous relationship that George had and now publicly acknowledges. Around the time when he thought he was dying, George was sexually involved with another woman, an event that Nancy has forgiven him.

And yet, despite all that the two of them through have been through over a long marriage, they radiate a peace of soul that impresses me deeply. They seem unconscious of having this effect on others because, when I asked them about the source of that peace, they seemed uncharacteristically at a loss for words.

Meditation helps, they answered. Then, paradoxically, they suggested it comes out of an activism directed toward others. “The community pulls us open to the world,” they say, providing a counterweight to caregiving.

Community, for them, is above all their religious community, a group of some 40 people who gather for the Eucharist each Saturday evening in the homes of members. The Mairs became Catholics years ago and much value the small community that shares their faith and their values.

Those who gather each week as “the Community of Christ of the Desert” place strong emphasis on the priesthood of the laity. Though Father Ricardo presides, they all say the central prayer of the Mass together. But “we don’t want to cause the bishop anxiety,” they add.

They live in Tucson, some 70 miles from the Mexican border. Of the struggles connected with the efforts of Mexicans to cross over to the United States side and those of the border police to stop them, the Mairs say: “It’s a war.”  Since peace and justice are the main focus of their religious community, they try to provide some assistance to the people who risk their lives trying to cross the desert in search of a better life.

George serves as Nancy’s caregiver, an activity that requires great patience from them both. In the face of her long, slow decline, George says: “I’m sometimes angry at God, sometimes at Nancy.”

It’s a never-ending struggle that requires continued managing of angry emotions: “Some of my prayers are angry prayers,” George admits. “But I get back love,” he says, referring perhaps to both Nancy and God.

And Nancy adds: “We have learned over time that anger happens and you won’t come to an end as a person.”  Besides which, they have found they can speak to their two cats. “You can thus communicate information to one another even when you can’t talk to the other guy.”

For Nancy especially, writing also helps. “Because I’m a writer of personal essays, I scrutinize experience the way others may not do,” she explains. George agrees on the value of this activity: “I’m sure her writing has helped us endure.”

Caregiving always threatens to become the center of things. But this couple insists: “Caregiving is not the point of our lives.”  They resist allowing it to siphon off their concern for others and for the peace and justice of the larger world.

The murder of their adopted son when he was in his 20s proved devastating to Nancy and George. They did take some consolation from hearing reported a conversation their son had had with a friend sometime before his sudden death. He told his friend that his life had begun at the point when Nancy and George adopted him.

Despite what happened to this young man, this couple continues to stand firmly opposed to capital punishment. Nancy’s reasoning is straightforward: “My son is dead. Why would I want anyone else dead?”

Richard Griffin

Whirling for God

Most adults will remember the childhood experience of turning around in place until becoming so dizzy it was necessary to stop. Frequently grown-ups would intervene so we would not faint or fall.

Most probably, there was nothing spiritual about that experience. However, it is just possible that, as children, we wanted obscurely to get some sense of a heightened consciousness. Without knowing what we were doing, we may have been trying to trans-port ourselves into a different world.

That’s what happens with the whirling dervishes, members of an ancient order of Sufis who dance ritually as an act of worship. For the first time in my life, I saw a group do this dance before a hushed and respectful audience. Beforehand, we were instructed not to applaud at the end because this was not a performance but rather a sacred event.

The ritual may go back to the beginning of Islam in the seventh century. However, the whirling dervishes are associated with the great Muslim poet and mystic Rumi who lived from 1207 to 1273. He is closely identified with one of the Sufi orders, the name being derived from either the Arabic word for wool or the Greek word for wisdom.

Before the ceremony, some twenty-five figures emerged on stage, all of them robed in black, wearing tall cone-shaped grain-colored felt hats, and some of them carry-ing musical instruments. After taking their places, a dozen or so came forward and shed their black robes, revealing long white skirts and blouses of the same color and material.

As the plaintive music began, the dancers started to whirl. They turned in place, over and over for what seemed to me a half-hour. To the dervishes it probably seemed timeless, thanks to their altered state of consciousness. The very name “dervish,” a Persian word meaning “threshold” suggests what the experience means.

Ideally, the whirling brings the dancers to the very edge of enlightenment. They enter into a kind of trance in which spirit is revealed as the deepest reality. They may have been repeating all the while the basic words of the Islamic faith, “There is no God but God” further defining the dance as an act of worship.  

To be frank, I found myself as a mere spectator brought close to sleep. The inten-sity of watching men repeat the same motions over and over was too much for me to bear. Were I more familiar with the Sufi tradition, presumably it would have been easier to enter into the inner experience of the dervishes.

Nonetheless, the spectacle had great style and beauty. Especially notable was the doffing of the outer garments revealing the white ones beneath. The change was symbol-ic: the dark clothes represents the world and its evils, while the white shows the blessed condition of people united to God.

I talked about the dervishes with a scholar, Nur Yalman , Professor of Social Anthropology at Harvard who was also in attendance. Thoroughly familiar with the rite and its history, Prof. Yalman described the experience as “beautiful.” To him, the dance represents “the rising up of the human spirit to a space between man and God.”

He sees special meaning in the hand gestures made by the dancers. “When they open up their right hand, they receive blessings from God; when they open their left, they pass on the blessings to people on earth.”

The total effect on people who witness the dance is precious. “The emphasis on love is valuable,” says Prof. Yalman, “and brings people together.”

Incidentally, the whirling dervishes were present in connection with an unusual exhibit in Harvard’s Sackler Museum. Called “Letters in Gold,” this exhibition displays calligraphy from the Ottoman empire. Calligraphy (beautiful writing) holds a vital place in Islamic art and worship and has been called “music for the eyes.”

Among the connections between the calligraphy and the dance is the following fact. The reed from which comes the flute-like instrument used in the dance is the same reed from which the “Kalem” or reed pen used in calligraphy.

Much of the writing reproduces chapters from the Qur’an, the holy book of the Is-lamic faith. It is revered as the word of God received by the prophet Mohammed in the seventh century.

Though I myself brought precious little previous knowledge to this display, the artistry behind the beautiful writing and the depth of spiritual feeling stirred my soul.

Richard Griffin

Heartfelt Compassion

Sometimes a single word or short phrase from a sacred text can stir rewarding refllection. Just thinking about the word or repeating the phrase silently can provide spiritual seekers with surprisingly rich food for the soul as we go about our ordinary tasks. Such language can also give us interior strength for the challenges of daily life and sometimes motivation for changing behavior.

Such a phrase struck me as I heard it read aloud in my church during one of the Christmas liturgies. Two words jumped out at me from a list of virtues that St. Paul urges upon the Christians who live in the city of Colossae in Asia Minor. Writing around the year 60, he exhorts them to transform their conduct, making it more like the Lord’s.

Hearing the words “heartfelt compassion” reminded me that one of the prime features in the spiritual traditions of both East and West is the virtue of compassion. The word’s Latin roots mean “suffering with” and suggest entering sympathetically into another person’s life when that person is struggling.

Together with enlightenment, compassion forms the bedrock of the spiritual life, as understood by many of the great religions of the world. By enlightenment, we are enabled to see things in God’s light; by compassion, we are empowered to reach out to others with loving concern.

The longer section of St. Paul’s beautiful text is worth repeating so as to identify the other virtues that accompany compassion. He tells the Colossians: “Put on, as God’s chosen ones, holy and beloved, heartfelt compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience, bearing with one another and forgiving one another, if one has a grievance against another; as the Lord has forgiven you, so must you also do. And over all these put on love that is the bond of perfection.”

Curious about the root meaning of the word translated as “heartfelt,” I consulted the original text. The Greek word turns out to be “splagchnon,” one almost impossible to pronounce because of all its consonants.

Not without some mild shock, I discovered that the word means “bowels.” To us moderns the word sounds anatomical, referring to the intestines. In biblical times, however, it was used metaphorically to indicate the center where a person’s truest self is found. Its meaning comes close to what we intend by heart, that is, the seat of our deepest feelings.     

Various translations of the New Testament show different approaches to the phrase. Two traditional versions reproduce the equivalent word: a standard Latin version translates it literally by the phrase “viscera misericordiae” and the classic 17th century King James Bible uses the phrase “bowels of mercies.” The modern Revised Standard Version, however, backs away from the literal meaning, dropping the word bowels altogether and simply saying compassion.

The translation read in my church is the New American Bible. The scholars responsible for rendering the Greek into English found what seems a happy medium. As noted above, they called it “heartfelt compassion.” In doing so, they directed attention to the heart as the central organ that we associate with feeling. They take account of  the modern way of describing human feeling, in which we often make reference to the heart.

Admittedly, however, heartfelt lacks the earthiness of the original word and therefore some of its force. We tend to pass over the word heartfelt without realizing the power of the original Greek word. “Heartfelt” clearly rates as an English equivalent but nonetheless it makes you see why the word translator in some languages is itself translated as “traitor.”

Paul wants his people to offer others, not pale, dutiful “charity” as that word is now often understood. Rather, he wants us to reach out to others in a feeling way. Our compassion is heartfelt when our whole person is invested in it, when we offer sympathetic help to others, giving of the best in ourselves.

This kind of compassion represents a marvelous ideal. Whether you think it is actually practiced often depends perhaps on how you see the world. Those who look at the bright side would cite numerous acts of heartfelt compassion; those for whom pessimism is the norm will bemoan the absence of enough compassion among members of the human family.

“Heartfelt compassion” is a phrase worthy of reflection and, even more so, of being put into practice.

Richard Griffin

Four Spiritual Writers

“My child, help your father in his old age, and do not grieve him as long as he lives; even if his mind fails, be patient with him; because you have all your faculties do not despise him. For kindness to a father will not be forgotten, and will be credited to you against your sins; in the day of your distress it will be remembered in your favor.”

These words date from around 180 B.C. and appear in a book called Sirach (also called Ecclesiasticus). Protestant tradition groups this work among the apocryphal books of the Bible, whereas the Catholic Church considers it an authentic part of the Hebrew Scriptures. In any event, Sirach belongs to the category of Wisdom literature and is grouped with other such sacred writings.

What has prompted me to focus on these words was their proclamation in the liturgy of the Eucharist in which I took part this past Sunday. They struck me with special force on this occasion, sounding altogether modern to my ears, as if they were written by someone with current gerontological consciousness. They seemed to speak to a situation facing adult children of aging parents all across America.

They also made me reflect on my own situation, standing on the brink of old age as I do, and gradually becoming better acquainted with some of the ills that flesh is heir to. Inevitably, I also thought of my only child as I wondered what role might await her when physical decline changes the conditions of my life. The ancient words of the author Sirach struck me forcibly in their exhortation to compassion on the part of adult children confronted with parental need for support.

The reference to the father’s mind failing sounds especially modern. The writer seems to speak as if he knows about the widespread dementia that has afflicted so many older Americans. To him, as to us, it strengthens the case for reaching out to help the older family member.

Unlike most contemporary books dealing with care of aged parents, this ancient sacred writing invokes divine rewards for such caring. Responding to parents this way, the author promises, will lead to forgiveness of sins. God himself will be minded to discount the wrongs done by those who reach out to their father and mother when it comes to a crisis or before that time.

Sirach also suggests that when those adult children themselves grow old and need help, God will remember the way they helped their parents. This promise, of course, includes both parents; though the passage quoted at the beginning mentions only fathers, other lines extend the same considerations to mothers too.

In our time, taking care of parents has become a normative stage in the life course of many, if not most, adults. The time comes, often in early middle age, when grown-up sons and daughters are confronted with the need to respond to their parents’ changed situation.

Often this happens when a sudden crisis hits, such as father or mother suffering a stroke or losing a partner to death. Then the family must get involved and take some responsibility for the well-being of the older person.

Most adults when they think of this situation associate it with the word stress. They know from the experience of others or some of their own how difficult it can be to take on the caregiving of older family members. Especially when they may already have responsibility for their own children, the burden can seem insupportable.

However, thinking about the situation exclusively in terms of burden and stress obscures invaluable benefits that can come from the experience. I like to quote Mary Pipher on this subject:

“Parents aging can be both a horrible and a wonderful experience. It can be the most growth-promoting time in the history of the family. Many people say, ‘I know this sounds strange, but that last year was the best year of my parents’ lives. I was my best. They were their best. Our relationships were the closest and strongest ever,’ or, ‘The pain and suffering were terrible. However, we all learned from it. I wouldn’t have waned things to be different.’”

After going through this experience herself, Pipher came to understand it as a crucial opportunity for younger adults to grow up. Caregiving of older family members, in this framework, emerges as a precious occasion for maturing and becoming better persons by reason of having assumed the burdens of their elders.

This latter way of looking at the experience clearly differs from that of Sirach but remains in harmony with it. Both authors stress the benefits of helping relationships between the generations. I take inspiration from the two of them and reflect on their words to help me appreciate even more one of the most important silent happenings in contemporary American life.
 
After the death of great French thinker and inventor, Blaise Pascal, one of his servants discovered hidden within the lining of his master’s coat a scrap of paper on which were written secret words that would live on.   

These are the burning words that he had written in 1654, 345 years ago this month:

“Fire: God of Abraham, God of Isaac, God of Jacob, not of  philosophers and thinkers. Certitude. Certitude. Feeling. Joy. Peace.”

These words, known as “The Testament,” witness to a vision this great Frenchman had of God’s real presence in his life. For him, God was no abstraction nor a being reserved for deep thinkers. Rather, God is available to every human and loves each one of us intimately.

Pascal’s words loom large in Philip Zaleski’s introduction to The Best Spiritual Writing of 1999. Professor Zaleski sees in them a sublime example of spiritual writing and an appropriate lead-in to the selections that follow.

Professor Zaleski came for a presentation at the public library in my community three Saturdays ago, along with two authors who contributed essays to this volume and one whose essay appeared in last year’s collection.

What a bonanza for fellow seekers to find on the panel writers who are known for their insights into the spiritual life!

One of them was Thomas Moore, author of Care of the Soul and other best selling books that have won him recognition across America. To meet and talk with him I took as a privilege because of my respect for his thoughtful probings of modern people’s desire for transcendence.

In his presentation, Thomas Moore told a story from the Zen tradition. One day, a Zen master is walking along a road and sees a temple that has fallen into rack and ruin. He determines to get it fixed so announces that on the next Saturday he will set himself on fire before the whole community.

He tells people who wish to see him burn that they should bring donations for restoration of the temple. As everyone watches, a priest comes forward with a torch to set the master afire.

“Wait,” says the master, “I see bodhisattvas (enlightened persons) in the sky – they’re telling me it’s not my time yet.

“Leave your offerings – I’ll be around next week.”

The moral of this tale, according to Thomas Moore? Vitally important though it is, “don’t take our spirituality too seriously.”

Another presenter, Harvard Divinity School professor Kimberly Patton, read a reflection focused on the birth of her daughter as an event filled with spiritual meaning. She made her own the words of a lawyer in the television drama “Chicago Hope” who had adopted a child with a severe heart problem. The lawyer, in response to a surgeon who asks how he can possibly manage this situation, answers: “I was never alive before.”

In becoming a new mother, Professor Patton learned things “that current social wisdom can never give us.”

Ultimately she realized that “God wants nothing less than our complete rebirth.” With this realization comes a stunning insight: “What better tool than a child who shatters our self-centered, fear-driven egos and causes, through Love’s great compulsion, our complete submission?”

Surprisingly enough, the third presenter, Andre Dubus III, also focused on childbirth. For him, the birth of his daughter was an event filled with emotions that, in a conversation with his father and brother, he expressed through his tears: “Now the walls of my heart seemed to fall away completely and become a green field within me.”

On this day of his daughter’s birth, he felt new certainty about the future, a certainty not available “without the horizonless love and attendant faith and hope that opens up in us when we are given the gift of children.”  

In concluding the discussion, Professor Zaleski observed that “the western world is now in reaction against the attempt to suppress spirituality.”

He also thinks it characteristic of our time that activities not previously seen as related to spirituality now bring people closer to the soul. Such activities as walking in the woods are now recognized as capable of producing in people a deeper appreciation of the sacred.

In Professor Zaleski’s view, it is important to see that spirituality is “a response, not a construction.” It is the human recognition that the whole world is filled with holiness.

Richard Griffin

Lisa Looks to 2004

In a Christmas letter, a friend of many years standing has written about changes in her life. Based in one of the mountain states, this middle-aged woman (whom I will call “Lisa”) has suffered through a recent divorce that has required her to make a new start. Her husband is now living with another woman, bringing to a definitive end a marriage of more than 25 years.

Lisa speaks of “all the drastic and difficult changes of this past year” and it is not hard to imagine what she means. She has had to accept a radical transformation of her life that, at an earlier stage, she would have considered unthinkable.

Another recent event is the unexpected marriage of her daughter. In her senior year of college, this young woman has surprised her mother by deciding to elope. Though Lisa expresses some pleasure in her daughter’s marriage, it  amounts to yet another change that requires a major adjustment.

My friend has now moved to another city and has begun a new job working with adults who have developmental disabilities. Her new home offers her a marvelous view of nearby hills and mountains and her job allows her to serve people who inspire her.

From these latter, Lisa has “gotten back just as much as I have given.” Despite their disabilities these clients of hers show talents that amaze her. She feels “blessed beyond measure” to have discovered what they can do.

My friend also feels blessed by family members both nearby and in other parts of the country. “They have helped heal my pain” she says, and they “enrich my life daily.”

A poet in her spare time, Lisa is now writing more. She hopes to collect her poems into a second book. From what I have seen of her earlier poems, I would expect the new ones to be worth sharing.

In concluding her Christmas message, my correspondent prays for us, her friends, hoping “that each of you shares your love and care with friends and family and that we all help to foster the peace which passeth all understanding.”

I share parts of this letter with readers because I think it captures the spirit of New Year hope. Here is a woman for whom the past year has brought much suffering and uncertainty. She has had to accept changes that no one would have chosen freely. Surely there must have been times when she has wept in frustration at what was happening to her.

One of the hardest facts to accept must surely be her own role in the breakup of her marriage. Since almost always both sides bear some blame for the failure, one can presume that she reproaches herself for some past mistakes. If only, she thinks, I had done things differently, maybe the marriage would have survived.  

Looking toward 2004, Lisa has established her life on a new footing. With courage, she has taken on the challenges of living alone and a different job.

While accepting change, she has had the wisdom to find consolation in those family members and friends who have shared their love with her. Lisa also values the men and women for whom she works, seeing in them a creativity not normally associated with people marked by severe disabilities.

In addition, this enterprising woman continues to discover her own creativity as she crafts new poems. This kind of writing enables her to express some of her soul’s struggles and breakthroughs.

I find inspiration in Lisa’s resiliency in the face of devastating loss. She is a person who has been wounded by the unexpected blows of life but, resisting self-pity, she has resolved to move ahead in her search for peace and love. She has the courage to look toward the future hoping for God’s good gifts.

Henri Nouwen, one of my favorite gurus, once wrote in an unpublished journal: “The great temptation is to use our many obvious failures and disappointments in our lives to convince ourselves that we are really not worth being loved.” Lisa, I like to think, has received the winter grace of resisting that temptation and of daring to make a new beginning in the spirit of hope.

Richard Griffin

Nimitz Suicide: The Spiritual Issues

A few years ago, Chester Nimitz, Jr., age 86, and his wife, Joan Nimitz, age 89, residents of North Hill in Needham, MA, took an overdose of sleeping pills and thus killed themselves.

To Americans over a certain age, the name Nimitz will reverberate. Like his father, the famous commander of the Pacific fleet in WWII, Chester Junior served in that same theater of war, eventually becoming an admiral himself. He later went on to notable success in the business world. His wife Joan, a native of England, was also distinguished and had been trained as a dentist before coming to this country.

In recent years both of them had experienced multiple infirmities. Among other things, Joan had become blind, while her husband’s heart problems had grown more severe. Approaching age ninety, they decided to take drastic action rather than face “physical limitations on our quality of life” and the continuing loss of independence.

Chester Nimitz was used to being in charge and did not welcome the sure prospect of losing his ability to control events. As Nancy Nimitz, the admiral’s  sister, told The New York Times, “They didn’t want to think in any way that their final days would be controlled by some whippersnapper internist at the hospital.”

Typical of him, Nimitz left everything in good order and even wrote a note threatening legal action against anyone who might try to resuscitate him and his wife.

I feel sympathy for this couple who lived their old age in the midst of such burdensome disease and disability. Were I confronted with the similar suffering, I might well be tempted to take the same lethal action.

As one who, last July, got up out of a hospital bed, stripped the monitoring wires from my chest, and successfully demanded of the resident in charge that he release me, I know how doctors and hospitals can impose their will on you. I can relate to Nancy Nimitz’ feisty (though somewhat ageist) statement about the young internist.

I do not want anyone’s life extended by technology contrary to their wishes. The prospect of being hooked up to a respirator, instead of being allowed to die, fills me with dread also.

Killing myself, however, would go against some of my deepest convictions. Even in a situation of great duress in extreme old age, doing so would violate my view of human life as a gift. In its catechism, my spiritual tradition affirms: “We are stewards, not owners, of the life God has entrusted to us. It is not ours to dispose of.” That is the way I continue to see my own life.

But aside from such teaching, the action taken by the Nimitz spouses strikes me as expressing a kind of rationalism that leaves out vitally important considerations. It also seems rooted in some aspects of American culture that many of us older people, and others, consider dehumanizing.

In this rationalism, dependence is regarded as something to be avoided at all costs. Retaining control, no matter what, is exalted as a supreme value. Suffering is perceived to have little or no worth. Better to put an end to it all rather than undergo physical deterioration.

Does not resorting to suicide in old age when daily life becomes very difficult, suggest that the life of those myriad elders who have become dependent on others for care lacks meaning? I believe that we retain our dignity as persons, no matter the changes that may deprive us of control.

And does not suicide make of dying an isolated individual act deprived of social character? Ideally, at least, we die with family members, friends, and care providers around us to support us in our departure and, if possible, to receive our blessing.

Isolation from family members and friends also deprives them of taking some responsibility for our care and entering into our experience. Agonizing as it can be, some of these people will testify that the opportunity to provide support for dying people has brought out the best in them.

The writer Mary Pipher tells what it was like for her and her parents: “The pain and suffering were terrible. However, we all learned from it. I wouldn’t have wanted things to be different.”

I have had enough experience of death myself not to romanticize it. As a young man, I worked as an orderly at Boston City Hospital. Among other duties, I attended to the physical needs of dying men and bound up the bodies of these patients after they died. Later, I served as a chaplain in the same hospital, ministering spiritually to dying people.

If the time comes when I can no longer cope and face unavoidable suffering, I want to trust others to care for and about me. I also hope to enter into an experience that may contribute to my own spiritual growth and that of others. Resorting to self-killing as an alternative strikes me as a blow against the values that make life and death so precious.

Richard Griffin

Sirach on Parent Case

“My child, help your father in his old age, and do not grieve him as long as he lives; even if his mind fails, be patient with him; because you have all your faculties do not despise him. For kindness to a father will not be forgotten, and will be credited to you against your sins; in the day of your distress it will be remembered in your favor.”

These words date from around 180 B.C. and appear in a book called Sirach (also called Ecclesiasticus). Protestant tradition groups this work among the apocryphal books of the Bible, whereas the Catholic Church considers it an authentic part of the Hebrew Scriptures. In any event, Sirach belongs to the category of Wisdom literature and is grouped with other such sacred writings.

What has prompted me to focus on these words was their proclamation in the liturgy of the Eucharist in which I took part this past Sunday. They struck me with special force on this occasion, sounding altogether modern to my ears, as if they were written by someone with current gerontological consciousness. They seemed to speak to a situation facing adult children of aging parents all across America.

They also made me reflect on my own situation, standing on the brink of old age as I do, and gradually becoming better acquainted with some of the ills that flesh is heir to. Inevitably, I also thought of my only child as I wondered what role might await her when physical decline changes the conditions of my life. The ancient words of the author Sirach struck me forcibly in their exhortation to compassion on the part of adult children confronted with parental need for support.

The reference to the father’s mind failing sounds especially modern. The writer seems to speak as if he knows about the widespread dementia that has afflicted so many older Americans. To him, as to us, it strengthens the case for reaching out to help the older family member.

Unlike most contemporary books dealing with care of aged parents, this ancient sacred writing invokes divine rewards for such caring. Responding to parents this way, the author promises, will lead to forgiveness of sins. God himself will be minded to discount the wrongs done by those who reach out to their father and mother when it comes to a crisis or before that time.

Sirach also suggests that when those adult children themselves grow old and need help, God will remember the way they helped their parents. This promise, of course, includes both parents; though the passage quoted at the beginning mentions only fathers, other lines extend the same considerations to mothers too.

In our time, taking care of parents has become a normative stage in the life course of many, if not most, adults. The time comes, often in early middle age, when grown-up sons and daughters are confronted with the need to respond to their parents’ changed situation.

Often this happens when a sudden crisis hits, such as father or mother suffering a stroke or losing a partner to death. Then the family must get involved and take some responsibility for the well-being of the older person.

Most adults when they think of this situation associate it with the word stress. They know from the experience of others or some of their own how difficult it can be to take on the caregiving of older family members. Especially when they may already have responsibility for their own children, the burden can seem insupportable.

However, thinking about the situation exclusively in terms of burden and stress obscures invaluable benefits that can come from the experience. I like to quote Mary Pipher on this subject:

“Parents aging can be both a horrible and a wonderful experience. It can be the most growth-promoting time in the history of the family. Many people say, ‘I know this sounds strange, but that last year was the best year of my parents’ lives. I was my best. They were their best. Our relationships were the closest and strongest ever,’ or, ‘The pain and suffering were terrible. However, we all learned from it. I wouldn’t have waned things to be different.’”

After going through this experience herself, Pipher came to understand it as a crucial opportunity for younger adults to grow up. Caregiving of older family members, in this framework, emerges as a precious occasion for maturing and becoming better persons by reason of having assumed the burdens of their elders.

This latter way of looking at the experience clearly differs from that of Sirach but remains in harmony with it. Both authors stress the benefits of helping relationships between the generations. I take inspiration from the two of them and reflect on their words to help me appreciate even more one of the most important silent happenings in contemporary American life.

Richard Griffin